PDF Barnes Notes on the New Testament-Book of 3rd John

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Barnes Notes on the New Testament-Book of 3rd John file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Barnes Notes on the New Testament-Book of 3rd John book. Happy reading Barnes Notes on the New Testament-Book of 3rd John Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Barnes Notes on the New Testament-Book of 3rd John at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Barnes Notes on the New Testament-Book of 3rd John Pocket Guide.
John 3 Commentary, One of over Bible commentaries freely available, this It will be recollected that the design of John in writing this gospel was to show.
Table of contents

  • Handbook of Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Formulations: Uncompressed Solid Products (Volume 2 of 6): Capsules: Volume 5.
  • Dictionaries;
  • Tentativa de agotamiento de un lugar parisino (Spanish Edition).
  • Abgeschminkt: Nieder mit dem Krippenspiel! II (German Edition).
  • Cardinali e cortigiane (eNewton Saggistica) (Italian Edition).
  • Albert Barnes: Barnes' New Testament Notes - Christian Classics Ethereal Library;
  • HCG DIET (lose up to a pound a day!).

Commentaries John S. Biblical Illustrator 56 volume commentary edited by Joseph S. Companion Bible Notes By E. Ellicott's eight volume commentary John Darby's Chapter Synopses A commentary focusing on each chapter, rather than each individual verse, of the Bible. By John Nelson Darby. Clarence Larkin. Includes 61 charts and illustrations. Mackintosh C. Over sermons in commentary form. The Preacher's Complete Homiletical Commentary 37 volumes.

Search Site with Google

Pulpit Commentary Edited by H. Spence, Joseph S. Morning and Evening Devotional Quite possibly the best daily devotional ever published, by C. Accessible by verse reference and by date.

Albert Barnes

Ryle's Expository Thoughts on the Gospels J. Scofield editor. McGarvey 's commentary on Acts. Through the Bible Day by Day F. Spurgeon's Treasury of David C. Spurgeon's mammoth seven-volume commentary on the Psalms, unabridged version. Treasury of Scripture Knowledge Expanded, with , cross-references.

Easton's Bible Dictionary Third edition. Includes maps and illustrations. Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language Over , word definitions and more than 4, scripture references linked. Edited by Noah Porter, One of the more unique Bible word dictionaries, in that several examples showing how words were used in literature are included for most definitions. Henry, Carl. The Pulpit Commentary.

  • monde où lon sennuie, Le (French Edition).
  • My Life with George: The Inspirational Story of How a Wilful Dog Brought Joy to a Bereaved Family;
  • 2 Corinthians (KJV) - Barnes' Notes.

Orthodox Study Bible. Luther, Martin. Meyer, F. Grotius, Hugo. International Critical Commentaries.

  • 3 John Overview - Albert Barnes' Notes on the Whole Bible!
  • Hochschulbildung - Finanzierung über Studiengebühren? (German Edition).
  • Bible Commentaries?
  • Bible Commentaries.
  • Should 360-Degree Feedback Be Used Only for Developmental Purposes?!
  • Cooperative Monitoring in the South China Sea: Satellite Imagery, Confidence-Building Measures, and the Spratly Islands Disputes: Satellite Imagery, Confidence-building ... Measures and the Spratly Islands Disputes?
  • Swift Fawn & Timid Hare the Little Captive (PrillyCharmin Indian Series Book 3).

For a list of the contributors after that, see here. Henry was a reformed puritan. He is most pious and pithy, sound and sensible, suggestive and sober, terse and trustworthy. You will find him to be glittering with metaphors, rich in analogies, overflowing with illustrations, superabundant in reflections. He delights in apposition and alliteration; he is usually plain, quaint, and full of pith; he sees right through a text directly; apparently he is not critical, but he quietly gives the result of an accurate critical knowledge of the original fully up to the best critics of his time.

He is not versed in the manners and customs of the East, for the Holy Land was not so accessible as in our day; but he is deeply spiritual, heavenly, and profitable; finding good matter in every text, and from all deducing most practical and judicious lessons. His is a kind of commentary to be placed where I saw it, in the old meeting-house at Chester [where Henry preached]—chained in the vestry for anybody and everybody to read.

You are aware, perhaps, that the latter part of the New Testament [after the book of Acts] was completed by other hands, the good man having gone the way of all flesh… they have executed their work exceedingly well, have worked in much of the matter which Henry had collected, and have done their best to follow his methods, but their combined production is far inferior to Matthew Henry himself, and any reader will soon detect the difference.

You will acquire a vast store of sermons if you read with your notebook close at hand; and as for thought, they will swarm around you like twittering swallows around an old gable towards the close of autumn. If you publicly expound the chapter you have just been reading, your people will wonder at the novelty of your remarks and the depth of your thoughts, and then you may tell them what a treasure Henry is.

SwordSearcher Bible Software - Deluxe Library Contents

What is not as well known is that his judiciousness as a commentator perhaps even excelled his skills as a theologian. This remains, after years, to be one of the best commentaries available. Slowly read it and you will understand why. How well has Calvin reached the meaning of the prophets—no one better. Of all commentators I believe John Calvin to be the most candid. In his expositions he is not always what moderns would call Calvinistic; that is to say, where Scripture maintains the doctrine of predestination and grace he flinches in no degree, but inasmuch as some Scriptures bear the impress of human free action and responsibility, he does not shun to expound their meaning in all fairness and integrity.

He was no trimmer and pruner of texts. He gave their meaning as far as he knew it. King very truly says of him,.

Albert Barnes' Notes on the Whole Bible

He is scrupulously careful to let it speak for itself, and to guard against every tendency of his own mind to put upon it a questionable meaning for the sake of establishing some doctrine which he feels to be important, or some theory which he is anxious to uphold. This is one of his prime excellences. He will not maintain any doctrine, however orthodox and essential, by a text of Scripture which to him appears of doubtful application, or of inadequate force.

For instance, firmly as he believed the doctrine of the Trinity, he refuses to derive an argument in its favor from the plural form of the name of God in the first chapter of Genesis. It were easy to multiply examples of this kind, which, whether we agree in his conclusion or not, cannot fail to produce the conviction that he is at least an honest commentator, and will not make an passage of Scripture speak more or less than, according to his view, its divine Author intended it to speak…. If you needed any confirmatory evidence as to the value of his writings, I might summon a cloud of witnesses, but it will suffice to quote one or two.

Here is the opinion of one who is looked upon as his great enemy, namely, Arminius:. Poole — was a reformed puritan. Poole has more largely discussed, and has industriously declined what is to be found there. The three volumes, tolerably cheap, and easily to be got at, are necessaries for your libraries.

He is a very prudent and judicious commentator; and one of the few who could honestly say:. Poole is not so pithy and witty by far as Matthew Henry, but he is perhaps more accurate, less a commentator, and more an expositor.

You meet with no ostentation of learning in Matthew Poole, and that for the simple reason that he was so profoundly learned as to be able to be able to give results without display of his intellectual crockery. A pedant who is for ever quoting Ambrose and Jerome, Piscator and Oecolampadius, in order to show what a copious reader he has been, is usually a dealer in small wares, and quotes only what others have quoted before him, but he who can give you the result and outcome of very extensive reading without sounding a trumpet before him is the really learned man… Strange to say, like the other great Matthew [Henry], he [Poole] did not live to complete his work beyond Isaiah 53; other hands united to finish the design.

Beyond all controversy, Gill was one of the most able Hebraists of his day, and in other matters no mean proficient. His great work on the Holy Scriptures is greatly prized at the present day by the best authorities, which is conclusive evidence of its value, since the set of the current of theological thought is quite contrary to that of Dr. His ultraism is discarded, but his learning is respected: the world and the church take leave to question his dogmatism [systematic theology], but they both bow before his erudition.

Say what you will about that lore, it has its value: of course, a man has to rake among perfect dunghills and dustheaps, but there are a few jewels which the world could not afford to miss. Gill was a master cinder-sifter among the Targums, the Talmuds, the Mishna, and the Gemara. He was always at work; it is difficult to say when he slept, for he wrote 10, folio pages of theology. The portrait of him which belongs to this church, and hangs in my private vestry, and from which all the published portraits have been engraved, represents him after an interview with an Arminian gentleman, turning up his nose in a most expressive manner, as if he could not endure even the smell of free-will.

In some such a vein he wrote his commentary. He hunts Arminianism throughout the whole of it. He is far from being so interesting and readable as Matthew Henry. He delivered his comments to his people from Sabbath to Sabbath, hence their peculiar mannerism. This is an easy method, gentleman, of filling up the time, if you are ever short of heads for a sermon. Show your people firstly, secondly, and thirdly, what the text does not mean, and then afterwards you can go back and show them what it does mean.